MSN Search
   
   
   

Your Personal Source of Information for and about Energy Independence


Energy Smart Schools | Rebuild America Schools | U.S. Department of Energy
Take the Family Home Energy Quiz

Annual Energy Outlook 2006 Report, click on image to download printer-friendly version.  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.
Adobe Acrobat Logo Click on image to download printer-friendly version

2006 Annual Energy Outlook, with Projections to 2030.
Department of Energy

Pioneer Hi Bred credit

Courtesy:Pioneer Hi-Bred
International, Inc.
Enlarge

Ethanol From Wikipedia

Currently the main feedstock in the United States for the production of ethanol is corn, but trials of a new crop, switchgrass, are showing much greater yields.

The dominant ethanol feedstock in warmer regions is sugarcane.

In some parts of Europe, particularly France and Italy, wine is used as a feedstock due to massive oversupply.

The largest single use of ethanol is as a motor fuel and fuel additive. The largest national fuel ethanol industries exist in Brazil. The Brazilian ethanol industry is based on sugarcane; as of 2004, Brazil produces 14 billion liters annually, enough to replace about 40% of its gasoline demand. Also as a result, they announced their independence from Middle East oil in April 2006. Most new cars sold in Brazil are flexible-fuel vehicles that can run on ethanol, gasoline, or any blend of the two. In addition, all fuel sold in Brazil contains at least 25% ethanol.

The products of the combustion of pure ethanol and pure oxygen (under ideal conditions) are water and carbon dioxide. The chemical combustion reaction of pure ethanol with pure oxygen is: C2H6O + 3 O2 → 2 CO2 + 3 H2O. However, the general reaction with stoichiometric air (normal atmospheric air) will produce a combination of water, carbon dioxide and an oxide of nitrogen. Nitrogen monoxide and nitrogen dioxide are possible products depending on combustion temperatures and reaction conditions.

The United States fuel ethanol industry is based largely on corn. As of 2005, its capacity is 15 billion liters annually. The Energy Policy Act of 2005 requires U.S. fuel ethanol production to increase to 28 billion liters (7.5 billion gallons) by 2012. In the United States, ethanol is most commonly blended with gasoline as a blend of up to 10% ethanol, known as E10 and nicknamed "gasohol". This blend is widely sold throughout the U.S. Midwest, which contains the nation's chief corn-growing centers.

In 2005, the Indy Racing League announced its cars will run on a 10% ethanol - 90% methanol blend fuel, and in 2007, the cars will race on 100% ethanol.

USA Energy Independence
(USA-EI)
2006 Membership Directory and
Source Guide

Thailand, India, China and Japan have now launched their national gasohol policies. Thailand started blending 10% ethanol for its ULG95 in 1985; now there are more than 4000 stations serving E10. The blending of 10% ethanol into 95 RON gasoline will be mandated by the end of 2006 and into 91 RON gasoline by the end of 2010. It is expected that once the production of ethanol from cassava and sugar cane molasses can be ramped up, a higher blending ratio like E20 or E85 or even Flexible Fuel Vehicles will be introduced to Thailand.

Ethanol with a water content of 2% or less can be used as the alcohol in the production of biodiesel, replacing methanol, which is quite dangerous to work with.

General Motors of Canada are preparing the launch of E85 flex-fuel vehicles, and will be sold at the same price as their gasoline-only versions. Most of these new vehicles are being produced in Oshawa, Ontario.

General Motors in the United States states they have over 2 million vehicles on the road in all 50 states that are capable of running under a 85% ethanol-15% gasoline blend known as E85. In 2006, GM will produce more than 400,000 flexible fuel vehicles annually -- vehicles that can also operate on gasoline or E85 ethanol without any modifications or special switches.

Unfortunately, ethanol cannot be transported by pipeline due to its chemical volatility. It currently is transported by railways and barges.

Also some of the problems experienced with ethanol include:

  • To match the detonation characteristics of gasoline at high-power settings, the utilization of ethanol-based fuels requires fuel-flow volume increases of nearly 40%. This means that currently-published performance information is not accurate when using ethanol-based fuels.
  • Ethanol-based fuels are not compatible with some fuel system components. Examples of extreme corrosion of ferrous components, the formation of salt deposits, jelly-like deposits on fuel strainer screens, and internal separation of portions of rubber fuel tanks have been observed in some vehicles using ethanol fuels.
  • The use of ethanol-based fuels can negatively affect electric fuel pumps by increasing internal wear and undesirable spark generation.
  • E-85 is not compatible with capacitance fuel level gauging indicators and may cause erroneous fuel quantity indications in vehicles that employ that system.
  • E-85 is capable of dissolving large amounts of water at conditions down to -77°, thereby impeding the detection and removal of water from the fuel system.
  • E-85 may block fuel filters, thereby affecting fuel flow.
  • E-85 experiences heavy evaporation losses.

Ethanol has only 66% of the energy content of gasoline (in terms of lower heating value with units of "BTU/US gallons").

Some believe butanol fuel is a better option since it can be made from the same corn and other natural products. It works in all existing cars not just flex fuel ones. It gets better gas-mileage than gasoline or ethanol and provides better octane levels. It also pollutes less than ethanol or gasoline per mile.

BioDiesel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Biodiesel Feedstock

Soybeans are used as a source of biodiesel
Enlarge
Soybeans are used as a source of biodiesel

A variety of oils can be used to produce biodiesel. These include:

Worldwide production of vegetable oil and animal fat is not yet sufficient to replace liquid fossil fuel use. Furthermore, some environmental groups object to the vast amount of farming and the resulting over-fertilization, pesticide use, and land use conversion that would be needed to produce the additional vegetable oil.

Many advocates suggest that waste vegetable oil is the best source of oil to produce biodiesel. However, the available supply is drastically less than the amount of petroleum-based fuel that is burned for transportation and home heating in the world. According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), restaurants in the US produce about 300 million US gallons (1,000,000 m³) of waste cooking oil annually.[1] Although it is economically profitable to use WVO to produce biodiesel, it is even more profitable to convert WVO into other products such as soap. Hence, most WVO that is not dumped into landfills is used for these other purposes. Animal fats are similarly limited in supply, and it would not be efficient to raise animals simply for their fat. However, producing biodiesel with animal fat that would have otherwise been discarded could replace a small percentage of petroleum diesel usage.

The estimated transportation fuel and home heating oil used in the United States is about 230,000 million US gallons (870 million m³) (Briggs, 2004). Waste vegetable oil and animal fats would not be enough to meet this demand. In the United States, estimated production of vegetable oil for all uses is about 23,600 million pounds (10,700,000 t) or 3,000 million US gallons (11,000,000 m³)), and estimated production of animal fat is 11,638 million pounds (5,279,000 t). (Van Gerpen, 2004)

Biodiesel feedstock plants utilize photosynthesis to convert solar energy into chemical energy. The stored chemical energy is released when it is burned, therefore plants can offer a sustainable oil source for biodiesel production. Most of the carbon dioxide emitted when burning biodiesel is simply recycling that which was absorbed during plant growth, so the net production of greenhouse gasses is small.

Feedstock yield efficiency per acre affects the feasibility of ramping up production to the huge industrial levels required to power a signifcant percentage of national or world vehicles. The highest yield feedstock for biodiesel is hydroponic algae, which can produce 250 times the amount per acre as soybeans. [1]

 

 

Stossel Sacrifices Solid Reporting in "Corn God..." report

 




Keith Sanderson
Cofounder USA Energy Independence
President and Editorial Director



May 4, 2007

 

The rebuttal of Keith Sanderson, President and Co-Founder U.S.A. Energy Independence to John Stossel of ABC's recent piece "Sacrificing our Children to the Corn God."
 
 
John,
 
I am usually quite impressed by your objectivity and in-depth research regarding   "Myths and Lies and Downright Stupidity". . However this time you and your team showed about as little in-depth knowledge about ethanol as you accuse many of your colleagues about having about science or economics.
 
Here are four reasons you are wrong regarding your piece "Sacrificing our Children to the Corn God,"
 
 
1.    Those who are in the hunt for ethanol such as Andy Karsner, Undersecretary of State, Vinod Khosla cited as one of the most influential venture captiaists by both Forbes and Fortune magazines,   Admiral Woolsey, VP Booz & Allen and former head of the Central Intelligence Agency, and Dr. Chu of of the Livermore research center who just received a $500,000,000 research grant from BP will all agree that corn ethanol is only a tranistional fuel source. They would likely agree that the U.S could not depend upon corn or row crop ethanol as the  primary source for ethanol. The future of ethanol is in cellulosic ethanol. And had your team done its job   they would have known that. You and your team failed to either understand the transitional nature of corn ethanol or chose not to include the whole story about ethanol in your report.
 
2.    Luddite-like you chose to report on ethanol as if all things will remain the same as far as energy. Here are the facts. According to the U.S. department of energy the U.S. imported more than 60% of its petroleum needs in 2007. Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, and Nigeria each provide us more than 10% of our oil. These nations are either unstable politically or located in unstable parts of the world. Imagine what would happen if something occurred to interrupt their oil to us. To help you imagine just think of the oil crisis in 1973. At that time the United States was importing far less oil as a percentage of its needs than the 60% of its consumption that it imports today. Gasoline rose in price from $.30 a gallon to $1.20. Today, a similar curtailment of oil supply could raise gasoline pump prices from $3.20 a gallon to almost $12.00 a gallon. Without both corn and cellulosic ethanol development a curtailment in oil imports to the U.S. will be crippling to your economy and have a much greater negative impact on our children than your claims of danger from ethanol development will ever have..
 
3.    Transport. Yes corn or cellulosic ethanol are more corrosive than gasoline. However, there is not the need to transport ethanol the great distances one must transport gasoline. Why? Because ethanol refineries are not scalable as are gasoline refineries. The nature of ethanol refineries (corn or celluolsic) scatter them across the country. Yes some modifications will have to be made to transport ethanol, but there will not be a need to secure pipelines in unstable areas such as Nigeria, and the Middle East, or secure ports and shipping lanes from those nations. In addition, Louisiana, Texas,California  refine 45% of the nation's gasoline. We luckily escaped severe damage on Louisiana refineries by Hurricane Katrina.  Experts such as Admiral Woolsey suggest that having our gasoline refining assets concentrated leaves this country open to supply interruptions due to both natural disasters and terrorism. The very nature of ethanol scatters our refining assets across the country.
 
4.    Technology moves on despite the fact your reporting doesn't recognize it. The automakers tell us they will have hybrid vehicles within the next ten years that will get more than 100 miles per gallon. The average commuter (40 miles per day) will not consume a drop of gasoline with new lithium battery technology. The increased gasoline mileage coupled with the production of corn ethanol and increased production of cellulosic ethanol can and will seriously decrease our dependence on foreign oil.
 
Mr. Stossel, I invite you to unlike most of your peers, admit that you made an error in reporting and set the record straight by busting the unfair myth you have created about ethanol by concentrating on corn ethanol and not on the total ethanol story.

 
Keith W. Sanderson
President and Cofounder

 

 

 

 

 

(C) Copyright 2006. USA Energy Independence.

Home | About Us | Contact Us | Site Map | Energy Links

27475 Ferry Rd, Warrenville, IL 60555